Discussion:
Bin Laden and Julian Assange, False flag and living plant
(too old to reply)
Sung Sung
2011-10-29 18:50:58 UTC
Permalink
655. Bin Laden and Julian Assange, False flag and living plant
(12/7/2010)

On 12/4, I wrote an article "Wiki-Leaks is another false flag" and
posted it in APFN. One hour later, I was surprised to find the topic
was replied by Julian Assange. I don't think it was Assange himself
did it. He is on the run. Most likely it is the work of his handler -
the Feds. The purpose is to link me to a would be "criminal". Assange
is a living plant like Bin Laden. Here is the topic:


[quote] Wiki-Leaks is another false flag ?kathaksung, Sat Dec 4 09:27

* Thats not all, Netanyahu said.... ?Percy, Sat Dec 4 18:52

o Julian Assange answers your questions ?Julian Assange, Sat Dec 4
10:24

http://disc.yourwebapps.com/discussion.cgi?disc=149495;article=134449;title=APFN
[/quote]

Bin Laden is a living plant.

In 1990, Soviet bloc collapsed. US intelligence turned its resource
which used to deal with Soviet bloc to the new target - Mid-east
countries which are rich in natural resource. Bin Laden, an asset of
the CIA in Afghanistan war(against Russian), was revived in this new
project as a false flag - Islamic extremist. He went to Sudan first in
1991.

[quote]The Sudanese offered to arrest Bin Laden and extradite him to
Saudi Arabia .

http://www.infowars.com/saved%20pages/Prior_Knowledge/Clinton_let_bin_laden.htm
[/quote]

Saudi and US didn't take the offer with various excuse because Bin
Laden is a living plant they deployed there.

In 1995, Bin Laden tried to set up a connection with Saddam but was
refused.

[quote] Exhaustive review finds no link between Saddam, al Qaida

A September 2006 report by the Senate Intelligence Committee concluded
that Saddam was "distrustful of al Qaida and viewed Islamic extremists
as a threat to his regime, refusing all requests from al Qaida to
provide material or operational support."

The Senate report, citing an FBI debriefing of a senior Iraqi spy,
Faruq Hijazi , said that Saddam turned down a request for assistance
by bin Laden which he made at a 1995 meeting in Sudan with an Iraqi
operative.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/mcclatchy/20080310/wl_mcclatchy/2875005 [/
quote]

Sudan may have felt the danger to accomodate Bin Laden. In May 1996,
the Sudanese asked bin Laden to leave. He went to Afghan and stay
there until now.

In August 1998, Sudan and Afghanistan were bombed by US missiles.

In 2001, after 911, Afghan, facing US invasion, made an offer but
failed.

[quote] Bush rejects Taliban offer to hand Bin Laden over
* Taliban demand evidence of Bin Laden's guilt

guardian.co.uk, Sunday 14 October 2001 22.19 BST

http://www.politic.co.uk/18142-remember-osama.html [/quote]

In Bin Laden's recent 20 years, the countries he went or tried to go,
have something in common: They all have rich natural resources. Sudan
and Iraq have oil. Afghan has rich mine. '

[quote]
Afghanistan to develop $3 trillion in mining potential
DUBAI | Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:14pm
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE69O3JP20101025 [/quote]

He didn't go to Yemen, Somali or Syria for his "revolution" because
they are resource poor countries, not in US interest list. He didn't
go to Saudi or Kuwait. Because they are US allies. He only went to
Sudan, Afghan, or Iraq (intended to) because these three countries
were not controlled by US at that time. As a living plant, he gave US
the excuse to activate attack on these three countries. (Even Saddam
realized that Bin Laden was a dangerous living plant and rejected him,
Iraq at last was invaded with an unexisted WMD)

Julian Assange is another false flag and living plant. The target is
not to control natural resource but to control the free speech kindom
- the Internet. If you have noticed that in last month, the events
come with the Wiki-leaks' third leaking. '

[quote] The 19 Senators Who Voted To Censor The Internet
from the free-speech-isn't-free dept

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101118/10291211924/the-19-senators-who-voted-to-censor-the-internet.shtml
[/quote]

[quote]US Government seizure of the internet has begun; DHS takes over
76 websites

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/030542_censorship_internet.html#ixzz17BCGjPeM
[/quote]

[quote] WIKILEAKS will leak 250.000 documents sunday nov 28
Sat Nov 27, 2010

http://disc.yourwebapps.com/discussion.cgi?disc=149495;article=134278;title=APFN;pagemark=60
[/quote]

What will be their next step? Feds will upgrade the secret level of
the leaking document to their puppet Assange. That will finally
justify the legitimate of control of the Internet. When you saw that
Wiki-Leaks is moving from this server to that, this web site to other,
do you realize all these sites could be potential victims of the next
wave of Internet censorship and seizure? Assange does same thing Bin
Laden has done.

I always say that I am the most wanted of the Feds. Though I am always
under the surveillance of the Feds, to set up an internet
communication with a "criminal" could justify their action and turn an
unreasonable search into a reasonable one. On 12/5, (next day that
Assange post reply to my article) A working van of "Direct TV" parked
at my front door. Technician installed something in my neighbor's
house. (we share one roof and the wall) I think that they were
installing detective instrument. My neighbor has had a dish satellite
antenna already.
Padraigh ProAmerica
2011-11-03 17:28:13 UTC
Permalink
Your history is...wrong.

CIA had nothing to do with Bin Asshole.

After the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, the U.S. tried to help the
Afghan fredom fighters in their struggle.

The man who spearheaded Congressional action was Rep. Charlie Wilson
(D-TX). His bill authorizing CIA funding of the Afghan Mujhadeen had a
clause restricting funding to Afghan groups only, not the foreign
jihadist groups (like Bin Assholes Al Qaeda bunch).

Wilson made at least two trips to Pakistan and then into Afghanistan to
see that the CIA was acting within the law.

Even the Afghans wanted nothing to do with Bin Asshole and his bunch.
Seems they were always talking a good fight, but when they were needed,
the sudenly became scarce.

IOW, they were cowards.

At that time Bin Asshole stil had access to his families fortune. After
they cut him off, he had serious and ongoing financial problems.
--
"History is not a spectator sport."-- Dr. Bruce Freeberg --
Loading...