"The one was Texas medicine, the other was just railroad gin"

[Jeffrey Rubard]

Hey gang,

How's W.'s treatment as an ex-President in the time of COVID going? Those virologists keeping busy?

[Jeffrey Rubard]

Post by Jeffrey Rubard
Hey gang,
How's W.'s treatment as an ex-President in the time of COVID going? Those virologists keeping busy?

I guess I may exaggerate the difficulty of this. I mean, it's not like he's that "Making Millions" guy
who gave some women an "incurable STD" through nonconsensual intercourse?

(I mean, think of it. What if that was HIV?)

[Jeffrey Rubard]

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard
Hey gang,
How's W.'s treatment as an ex-President in the time of COVID going? Those virologists keeping busy?

I guess I may exaggerate the difficulty of this. I mean, it's not like he's that "Making Millions" guy
who gave some women an "incurable STD" through nonconsensual intercourse?
(I mean, think of it. What if that was HIV?)

W. should give "Making Millions" a stern talking-to about that unappealing prospect, right? I mean, seriously.
Doesn't the thought of *giving women HIV by raping them* -- the Dallas Morning News article seems to suggest this is
an interpretation of the facts of the matter - make your skin crawl?

[Jeffrey Rubard]

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard
Hey gang,
How's W.'s treatment as an ex-President in the time of COVID going? Those virologists keeping busy?

I guess I may exaggerate the difficulty of this. I mean, it's not like he's that "Making Millions" guy
who gave some women an "incurable STD" through nonconsensual intercourse?
(I mean, think of it. What if that was HIV?)

W. should give "Making Millions" a stern talking-to about that unappealing prospect, right? I mean, seriously.
Doesn't the thought of *giving women HIV by raping them* -- the Dallas Morning News article seems to suggest this is
an interpretation of the facts of the matter - make your skin crawl?

I dunno, maybe they go to the same doctor and they can have them "compare notes" so that guy gets the idea.

[Jeffrey Rubard]

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard
Hey gang,
How's W.'s treatment as an ex-President in the time of COVID going? Those virologists keeping busy?

I guess I may exaggerate the difficulty of this. I mean, it's not like he's that "Making Millions" guy
who gave some women an "incurable STD" through nonconsensual intercourse?
(I mean, think of it. What if that was HIV?)

W. should give "Making Millions" a stern talking-to about that unappealing prospect, right? I mean, seriously.
Doesn't the thought of *giving women HIV by raping them* -- the Dallas Morning News article seems to suggest this is
an interpretation of the facts of the matter - make your skin crawl?

I dunno, maybe they go to the same doctor and they can have them "compare notes" so that guy gets the idea.

Maybe they'd just have to compare W.'s test results to "Making Millons" so that he *got the idea*. (Can't have people
carrying too heavy a load, after all.)

[Jeffrey Rubard]

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard
Hey gang,
How's W.'s treatment as an ex-President in the time of COVID going? Those virologists keeping busy?

I guess I may exaggerate the difficulty of this. I mean, it's not like he's that "Making Millions" guy
who gave some women an "incurable STD" through nonconsensual intercourse?
(I mean, think of it. What if that was HIV?)

W. should give "Making Millions" a stern talking-to about that unappealing prospect, right? I mean, seriously.
Doesn't the thought of *giving women HIV by raping them* -- the Dallas Morning News article seems to suggest this is
an interpretation of the facts of the matter - make your skin crawl?

I dunno, maybe they go to the same doctor and they can have them "compare notes" so that guy gets the idea.

Maybe they'd just have to compare W.'s test results to "Making Millons" so that he *got the idea*. (Can't have people
carrying too heavy a load, after all.)

NB: Oh, you. We'd have different "subtypes".

[Jeffrey Rubard]

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard
Hey gang,
How's W.'s treatment as an ex-President in the time of COVID going? Those virologists keeping busy?

I guess I may exaggerate the difficulty of this. I mean, it's not like he's that "Making Millions" guy
who gave some women an "incurable STD" through nonconsensual intercourse?
(I mean, think of it. What if that was HIV?)

W. should give "Making Millions" a stern talking-to about that unappealing prospect, right? I mean, seriously.
Doesn't the thought of *giving women HIV by raping them* -- the Dallas Morning News article seems to suggest this is
an interpretation of the facts of the matter - make your skin crawl?

I dunno, maybe they go to the same doctor and they can have them "compare notes" so that guy gets the idea.

Maybe they'd just have to compare W.'s test results to "Making Millons" so that he *got the idea*. (Can't have people
carrying too heavy a load, after all.)

NB: Oh, you. We'd have different "subtypes".

"Making Millions", on the other hand, and W. would *just have different HIV viral loads*.

"0" is a different viral load, yeah.

Go ahead and fill in, HIV-positive Republicans! Don't let the Texans be alone on these issues!

[Jeffrey Rubard]

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard
Hey gang,
How's W.'s treatment as an ex-President in the time of COVID going? Those virologists keeping busy?

I guess I may exaggerate the difficulty of this. I mean, it's not like he's that "Making Millions" guy
who gave some women an "incurable STD" through nonconsensual intercourse?
(I mean, think of it. What if that was HIV?)

W. should give "Making Millions" a stern talking-to about that unappealing prospect, right? I mean, seriously.
Doesn't the thought of *giving women HIV by raping them* -- the Dallas Morning News article seems to suggest this is
an interpretation of the facts of the matter - make your skin crawl?

I dunno, maybe they go to the same doctor and they can have them "compare notes" so that guy gets the idea.

Maybe they'd just have to compare W.'s test results to "Making Millons" so that he *got the idea*. (Can't have people
carrying too heavy a load, after all.)

NB: Oh, you. We'd have different "subtypes".

"Making Millions", on the other hand, and W. would *just have different HIV viral loads*.

"0" is a different viral load, yeah.

Go ahead and fill in, HIV-positive Republicans! Don't let the Texans be alone on these issues!

It would hardly be "Methodical" to let the problems of the "Making Millions" star obscure the legacy
of George W. Bush. You've got to be good about it for you and everyone else.

[Jeffrey Rubard]

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard
Hey gang,
How's W.'s treatment as an ex-President in the time of COVID going? Those virologists keeping busy?

I guess I may exaggerate the difficulty of this. I mean, it's not like he's that "Making Millions" guy
who gave some women an "incurable STD" through nonconsensual intercourse?
(I mean, think of it. What if that was HIV?)

W. should give "Making Millions" a stern talking-to about that unappealing prospect, right? I mean, seriously.
Doesn't the thought of *giving women HIV by raping them* -- the Dallas Morning News article seems to suggest this is
an interpretation of the facts of the matter - make your skin crawl?

I dunno, maybe they go to the same doctor and they can have them "compare notes" so that guy gets the idea.

Maybe they'd just have to compare W.'s test results to "Making Millons" so that he *got the idea*. (Can't have people
carrying too heavy a load, after all.)

NB: Oh, you. We'd have different "subtypes".

"Making Millions", on the other hand, and W. would *just have different HIV viral loads*.

"0" is a different viral load, yeah.

Go ahead and fill in, HIV-positive Republicans! Don't let the Texans be alone on these issues!

It would hardly be "Methodical" to let the problems of the "Making Millions" star obscure the legacy
of George W. Bush. You've got to be good about it for you and everyone else.

If it even were the case that there were questions about George W. Bush's serostatus, as opposed
to the "Making Millions" man being sued for giving rape victims an "incurable STD" which is probably
HIV, you could sure reach out and share your wisdom and expertise! America'd be behind it.

No, *I* didn't give it to him.

[Jeffrey Rubard]

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard
Hey gang,
How's W.'s treatment as an ex-President in the time of COVID going? Those virologists keeping busy?

I guess I may exaggerate the difficulty of this. I mean, it's not like he's that "Making Millions" guy
who gave some women an "incurable STD" through nonconsensual intercourse?
(I mean, think of it. What if that was HIV?)

W. should give "Making Millions" a stern talking-to about that unappealing prospect, right? I mean, seriously.
Doesn't the thought of *giving women HIV by raping them* -- the Dallas Morning News article seems to suggest this is
an interpretation of the facts of the matter - make your skin crawl?

I dunno, maybe they go to the same doctor and they can have them "compare notes" so that guy gets the idea.

Maybe they'd just have to compare W.'s test results to "Making Millons" so that he *got the idea*. (Can't have people
carrying too heavy a load, after all.)

NB: Oh, you. We'd have different "subtypes".

"Making Millions", on the other hand, and W. would *just have different HIV viral loads*.

"0" is a different viral load, yeah.

Go ahead and fill in, HIV-positive Republicans! Don't let the Texans be alone on these issues!

It would hardly be "Methodical" to let the problems of the "Making Millions" star obscure the legacy
of George W. Bush. You've got to be good about it for you and everyone else.

If it even were the case that there were questions about George W. Bush's serostatus, as opposed
to the "Making Millions" man being sued for giving rape victims an "incurable STD" which is probably
HIV, you could sure reach out and share your wisdom and expertise! America'd be behind it.

No, *I* didn't give it to him.

Pretty sure Karl Rove didn't, either.
(Fair is fair.)

[Jeffrey Rubard]

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard
Hey gang,
How's W.'s treatment as an ex-President in the time of COVID going? Those virologists keeping busy?

I guess I may exaggerate the difficulty of this. I mean, it's not like he's that "Making Millions" guy
who gave some women an "incurable STD" through nonconsensual intercourse?
(I mean, think of it. What if that was HIV?)

W. should give "Making Millions" a stern talking-to about that unappealing prospect, right? I mean, seriously.
Doesn't the thought of *giving women HIV by raping them* -- the Dallas Morning News article seems to suggest this is
an interpretation of the facts of the matter - make your skin crawl?

I dunno, maybe they go to the same doctor and they can have them "compare notes" so that guy gets the idea.

Maybe they'd just have to compare W.'s test results to "Making Millons" so that he *got the idea*. (Can't have people
carrying too heavy a load, after all.)

NB: Oh, you. We'd have different "subtypes".

"Making Millions", on the other hand, and W. would *just have different HIV viral loads*.

"0" is a different viral load, yeah.

Go ahead and fill in, HIV-positive Republicans! Don't let the Texans be alone on these issues!

It would hardly be "Methodical" to let the problems of the "Making Millions" star obscure the legacy
of George W. Bush. You've got to be good about it for you and everyone else.

If it even were the case that there were questions about George W. Bush's serostatus, as opposed
to the "Making Millions" man being sued for giving rape victims an "incurable STD" which is probably
HIV, you could sure reach out and share your wisdom and expertise! America'd be behind it.

No, *I* didn't give it to him.

Pretty sure Karl Rove didn't, either.
(Fair is fair.)

No, not even Charlie Sheen. (Was it like that, though? How does that at-all count as "conservatism"?)

[Jeffrey Rubard]

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard

Post by Jeffrey Rubard
Hey gang,
How's W.'s treatment as an ex-President in the time of COVID going? Those virologists keeping busy?

I guess I may exaggerate the difficulty of this. I mean, it's not like he's that "Making Millions" guy
who gave some women an "incurable STD" through nonconsensual intercourse?
(I mean, think of it. What if that was HIV?)

W. should give "Making Millions" a stern talking-to about that unappealing prospect, right? I mean, seriously.
Doesn't the thought of *giving women HIV by raping them* -- the Dallas Morning News article seems to suggest this is
an interpretation of the facts of the matter - make your skin crawl?

I dunno, maybe they go to the same doctor and they can have them "compare notes" so that guy gets the idea.

Maybe they'd just have to compare W.'s test results to "Making Millons" so that he *got the idea*. (Can't have people
carrying too heavy a load, after all.)

NB: Oh, you. We'd have different "subtypes".

"Making Millions", on the other hand, and W. would *just have different HIV viral loads*.

"0" is a different viral load, yeah.

Go ahead and fill in, HIV-positive Republicans! Don't let the Texans be alone on these issues!

It would hardly be "Methodical" to let the problems of the "Making Millions" star obscure the legacy
of George W. Bush. You've got to be good about it for you and everyone else.

If it even were the case that there were questions about George W. Bush's serostatus, as opposed
to the "Making Millions" man being sued for giving rape victims an "incurable STD" which is probably
HIV, you could sure reach out and share your wisdom and expertise! America'd be behind it.

No, *I* didn't give it to him.

Pretty sure Karl Rove didn't, either.
(Fair is fair.)

No, not even Charlie Sheen. (Was it like that, though? How does that at-all count as "conservatism"?)

Of the form: "Is? Is. Isn't? Isn't."
#hivtestslikethat